Log in

No account? Create an account
April 2017   01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Posted on 2005.11.07 at 19:55


Generation Y's Howard Beale
dk at 2005-11-08 19:45 (UTC) (Link)
well i just reread the article- and it looks like their requirements will be satisfied by your average soho netgear router-

Such a firewall, used to block intrusions from outside the local network, would be required

which i guess makes the law more ineffectual than anything else...?
ice_9 at 2005-11-08 20:01 (UTC) (Link)
yeah, it's easy to buy the required equipment, but to make it illegal to have it set up "incorrectly" sets a dangerous precedent.

i like to leave my wireless access point open to the public - i have a separate firewall behind it to protect my machines, but i'm happy to share my net access with anyone passing by. i think it should be the user's choice to allow or deny public access.

apart from that, my mom, who is a perfectly capable human being with multiple graduate degrees, doesn't know how to set up a wireless router. under this law, if i'm reading it correctly, she could be cited if she fails to set it up with "acceptable" security. fuck that.
Generation Y's Howard Beale
dk at 2005-11-09 03:48 (UTC) (Link)
she could be cited if she fails to set it up with "acceptable" security. fuck that.

call me a cynic, but i'm betting any such lawsuit would be quickly countersued to the manufacturer for not providing such a setup by default.
Previous Entry  Next Entry